Skip to content
Case study · Expo Living 2026

1,598 attendees measured one by one

Expo Living was a first edition: a real estate event with no prior reputation to lean on. We built and ran the full capture, registration, and measurement system — and by closing time we could say exactly who showed up, where they came from, and what they were looking for.

Real estate expo · July 25–26, 2026 · Hall G, Cintermex · Monterrey, Mexico

1,598

Unique attendees

Day 1: 886 · Day 2: 824

3,549

Registrations

own capture, no purchased lists

44.3%

Registration → attendance

measured floor, door scan

$45

Cost per registration

MXN · capture campaigns

The challenge

An event nobody knew yet

A first edition has no track record to build trust on: no past editions, no reviews, no audience that already knows what it's about. And for free events the problem isn't filling out a form — it's whether the person actually shows up. Without a system that ties registration and door together, the organizer ends up with a signup count and no certainty.

  • First edition: zero prior reputation to lean on.
  • Free entry: registration is cheap, attendance is what's expensive.
  • With no door measurement, there's no way to know which channel brought real people.
What we built

Four pieces, one system

Registration, database, check-in, and communication living in the same place. That's what makes person-level measurement possible instead of campaign-level.

Registration microsite

registro.expoliving.mx — a single page with countdown, conference agenda, exhibitor directory, and a form wired live into the CRM. Designed, built, and measured by us.

  • 9,650 users
  • 2,544 completed registrations
  • ~26% conversion

Event CRM

Every registration lands as a record with city, stated interest, budget range, and financial institution. That's why the audience profile can be cross-referenced against actual attendance — it isn't a separate survey.

  • 13,119 contacts
  • 3,549 own registrations
  • 9,569 list tagged separately

QR check-in

One code for both days, timestamping each entry. Live counter, name search if someone arrived without their code, tolerant of internet drops, and nothing to install: it runs on any phone or tablet.

  • 1,598 measured attendees
  • 112 came both days
  • Name-search fallback

Email sequence

Five emails from the CRM on its own domain, built in Expo Living's identity — not generic templates — personalized with the name and stated interest from registration.

  • ~15,300 sends
  • Welcome + QR: 3,540
  • Last call: 2,726
The funnel

From impression to door

Impressions
1.76M
Unique reach
485K
Users on site
9,650
Registered
3,549
Attendees
1,598

The auditable figure is the floor: 44.3% of registrants were checked in by scan. Using on-site registrants as known truth (they attended 100% and even so only 53.9% got scanned), the scanner captured roughly half of everyone actually present — which puts estimated real attendance at ~2,932 people (~82%). That's a statistical estimate, not a measurement: the number we stand behind is the floor.

Against the industry

How it compares

KPIOur resultIndustry reference
Site conversion (visit → registration)~26%2–6%
Ad CTR (Meta)2.6%0.9–1.5%
Average frequency3.6×2–4× (healthy)
Registration → attendance44.3%free event
Cost per attendee$42 MXN

Honest note: part of these numbers is boosted by the recognition of Cintermex and of the event brand. The two cost figures use different bases and aren't comparable — cost per registration takes only capture spend and the registrations it attributed; cost per attendee divides total spend across all attendees.

The finding

A lender partnership doesn't just add registrations: it adds registrations that show up

The form asked whether the person had been invited by a lender. Cross-referencing that answer with door check-in surfaced the pattern: of the 560 who said Infonavit invited them, 55.0% were confirmed at the door, versus 44.6% of those invited by nobody. A ten-point gap. Other institutions had marginal volume (BBVA 49, Banamex 11, Caja Popular 10).

That kind of read only exists when the registration question and the door scan live in the same system.

560

registrations invited by Infonavit

55.0%

of them confirmed at the door

+10 pts

above everyone else

Who registered

Profile declared at registration

What are they after?

Buying48%
All (buy / invest / advice)25%
Advice14%
Investing6%

Top municipalities

Monterrey1,129
Guadalupe491
Apodaca418
San Nicolás405

85–92% field coverage. 69% selected the first budget range — entry and mid-market. 38% are between 25 and 34. 100% of registrants are from the Monterrey metro area.

B2B leads

15 exhibitors captured

Beyond the general public, the system captured exhibitor and brand registrations: five developers, five real estate firms, two financial institutions, two suppliers, and one broker. American Express joined two days before the event.

American ExpressCasas JaverBrezzaManareAxioma ProyectosMargoJAGARCal Mejía+7 independents (brokers and agencies)
The detail that moved the needle

Sunday morning's email

Day 2 stood at 413 entries by midday. A last-call email went out only to people who had registered but hadn't yet appeared at the door — 2,726 of them — and Sunday afternoon closed at 824 entries, nearly matching Day 1.

413

entries by midday

824

at the close of Day 2

Segmenting by “registered but not attended” is only possible when registration and check-in are the same system. That email couldn't have been sent from a standalone email tool.

Methodology

Where these figures come from

  1. 01Registrations and attendance come from the event CRM, cut off at the close of July 26. The registration site stayed online afterward, so its counter is higher today: the figures here are frozen at that date, which is the correct basis for measuring the event.
  2. 02“Attendee” means QR check-in at the door on at least one day. These are measured, auditable figures; actual turnout may have been higher.
  3. 03The 3,549 registrations are 100% own capture from the site and campaigns. The Expo Tu Casa cross-invitation list (9,569) is tagged separately and does not count as an own registration.
  4. 04Cost per registration = capture spend ÷ attributed registrations. Cost per attendee = total media spend ÷ unique attendees. Different bases, not comparable to each other.
  5. 05The registration software, CRM, and access measurement were rented and operated by us; the physical QR scanning used Cintermex's own scanners.

Have an event worth measuring like this?

If you're going to invest in filling a hall, it's worth knowing who showed up and why. Book a diagnostic and let's look at it.

Visit the registration site